Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Using a single-spell discrete-time competing risks model, we examine the relationship between merit aid loss and four- to two-year transfer behavior and its implications for racial/ethnic and income disparities. Our results depict that Losing HOPE corresponds to a higher risk of reverse transfer, and the greatest potential for improving the HOPE retention rates occurs in the time period leading up to the first checkpoint. Moreover, merit aid loss disproportionately affects Black students’ probability of reverse transfer across the GPA eligibility thresholds, which poses negative implications for BA degree completion. Aspire recipients (low-income students) that lose their aid, however, are less likely than non-Aspire students to reverse transfer, potentially attributable to Pell-grant eligibility. Future research is necessary to disentangle these mechanisms. Policymakers should consider examining ways to mitigate student departure for these already disenfranchised subgroups such as revising renewal criteria.