Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The current study examined whether students’ social perspective taking (SPT) could be developed through small group argumentative discussions. A total of 250 fifth-grade students were assigned to three conditions: Collaborative Social Reasoning (CSR), Read Aloud (RA) and Regular Instruction (RI). Students’ SPT was assessed before and after the intervention using a reflective essay task. Poisson regressions with Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) revealed that CSR students considered more social perspectives and provided more empirical and emotional reasons to justify those perspectives in comparison with students in the RA and RI groups. The findings shed light on the role of small-group discussions in enhancing students’ SPT via cognitive and affective pathways.
Ziye Wen, The Ohio State University
Tzu-Jung Lin, The Ohio State University
Michael Glassman, The Ohio State University - Columbus
Saetbyul Kim, The Ohio State University - Columbus
Seung Yon Ha, The Ohio State University
Shantanu Tilak, The Ohio State University
Manisha Naresh Nagpal, The Ohio State University