Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
As teacher educators (TEs) guide teacher candidates’ (TCs) thinking about teaching, they implicitly construct images of the students receiving that teaching. Given longstanding concerns about TCs’ perceptions of urban students, this comparative multi-case study observes six TEs representing a spectrum of views about practice to ask how urban students are represented in episodes of practice in methods courses. I find that each TE engaged in pedagogies of practice that showcased urban students. In their discussions, TEs tended to homogenize urban students, rarely prompting TCs to consider individual students or diversity within the class. And TEs frequently portrayed urban students as capable thinkers, rarely highlighted students’ funds of knowledge, and almost never addressed students’ subjectivity beyond their role as learners.