Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Research shows that peer interaction requires scaffolding in online inquiry-based learning contexts. However, the research shows that scaffolding design impacts learning outcomes. This study (N = 132) compared the design of two prompts: problem representation and full problem-solving prompts (problem representation, alternatives, justification, evaluation). Discussions were analyzed using the interaction analysis model. Those in the full problem-solving condition were more likely to challenge the assertion of their peers (Phase 2). However, the problem representation condition was more likely to integrate feedback from peers as the interaction progressed (Phase 3). This research offers implications about how the design of prompts affect the malleability of mental models as learners encounter differing perspectives from their peers and their willingness to consider diverse perspectives.