Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This Critical Policy Analysis-informed document analysis shows how policymakers use “diversity” to address educational inequities. Diversity is not defined in NYC, allowing it to shift meaning depending on audience. The educational and social benefits of diversity advertised by the policy commodify diversity, making it valuable to privileged students and erasing the systemic inequality that created segregated schools in the first place. Finally, policy language holds schools more accountable to diverse enrollment but less accountable for metrics of inclusion, which are critical for addressing inequality. By examining the language of diversity through a critical lens, one can better understand how hegemonic power structures are preserved, even in “progressive” education policy.