Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Teachers today work within the context of two competing global educational agendas: a testing agenda, and an inclusion agenda. In this paper, we compare assessment policies in four distinct national contexts: Argentina, China, Denmark, and Israel. Through analysis of key assessment policy texts, we aim to understand how teachers, their practice and professionalism are constructed discursively by national policymakers. Adopting an interpretive standpoint, which treats policy documents as social constructs, we attempt to explore the underlying ideological assumptions about the purposes of assessment, and teachers’ location within these two areas of professional practice. Although tentative, our findings reveal that, while certain inclusive practices are encouraged, teachers are largely absent as active agents within the assessment sphere.