Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Students in science education struggle with creating and iteratively revising models based on evidence. We report on an implementation of a “gallery walk” activity where 5th grade students used the Model and Evidence Mapping Environment (MEME) software tool to develop and then critique each other’s models of an algal bloom. MEME was designed to support students in creating visual models organized around the components and mechanisms of the target phenomena, linking evidence to those models, and then providing and responding to comments on the specific features of the model. Findings illustrate how this was a productive environment for students to make their ideas about modeling criteria visible, and how their ideas cut across normative dimensions of modeling expertise.
Joshua Adam Danish, Indiana University
Morgan Vickery, Indiana University - Bloomington
Ravit Golan Duncan, Rutgers University
Zachary David Ryan, Indiana University - Bloomington
Christina Stiso, Indiana University - Bloomington
Melissa Moreland, Indiana University - Bloomington
Danielle Murphy, Rutgers University
Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver, Indiana University
Clark A. Chinn, Rutgers University