Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In 2007, along with my co-authors Walter R. Allen and Lynette L. Danley, we published an article entitled “Assume the position . . .You fit the description: Psychosocial experiences and racial battle fatigue among African American male college students.” In 2016, I published a follow-up article with Jalil Bishop Mustaffa, Chantel M. Jones, Tommy J. Curry, and Walter R. Allen called “‘You make me wanna holler and throw up both my hands!’: Campus Culture, Black misandric microaggressions, and racial battle fatigue.” Both research studies addressed the hyperinvisibility, hypervisibility, hypersurveillance, and anti-Black misandry targeted against college-going Black men. These Black men were constantly viewed as being “out of place” or “fitting the description” of illegitimate members of the campus community.
It is understood (implicitly and explicitly) by most marginalized racial/ethnic groups that ultimate control is reinforced by white power (i.e., police power, institutional power, and ‘community policing’), which protects white privilege and ‘white spaces’ while imposing stigma on targets of white supremacy. Black men college students experience a social cost when they identify discrimination as the reason for blocked opportunities. Kaiser and Miller (2001) found that no matter how much self-reported discrimination a Black male student faced, he was rated as more hypersensitive, emotional, argumentative, irritating, trouble making, and a complainer when he suggested that discrimination or racism was the source of his frustration, blocked opportunities, and reduced successes. Simply put, this irrational framing aligns with a historical framing of Black men as cognitively inferior and voluntarily lazy (Allen & Jewell, 2002).
The question that I am posing for this session, based on these two studies, is what have we missed by looking at racial microaggressions at the gross level? I believe that by re-examining these data, we will discover micro-traumatic events or microbursts. These microbursts occur rapidly and often go undetected during data analysis. By considering microbursts, we can find the fuller impact of racial microaggressions on racially targeted people, especially when the campus and local police harass them.