Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Wolcott (2002), in his essay on deconstructing ethnography, claims that “ethnography is more than a method” (p. 41). This paper argues that theories of care, particularly color-conscious theories of care, can be used to inform ethnographic research methods, fostering deeper cultural awareness and sensitivity. The guiding research question— How can theories of care inform more robust ethnographic practices?—will bridge a largely unexplored gap between care and ethnography. This theoretical binding of care and ethnography also raises a call to action for educational anthropologists to see their positions as grounded in care. Researchers in this field must be critical, authentic carers (Antrop‐González & Jesús, 2006; Noddings, 2013; Valenzuela, 1999) first, and educational anthropologists second.