Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This research examined the effect of student and district characteristics on the likelihood of student/parents receiving reimbursement in special education due process hearings in California, in rulings where each party partially won. Using a database we compiled (2005-2019), the study analyzed the likelihood of reimbursement orders with the following educational dis/advantage proxy variables: Student being the plaintiff, counsel representation, use of a translator; the dispute concerning private school placement; and district’s free/reduced-priced meal rate. Regression models indicate that a translator and district’s free/reduced meal rates were negatively associated with reimbursement orders. We discuss rights-based legislation and its private enforcement more broadly. While the decisions remedy individual grievances, they raise equity concerns for those who do not bring forward a claim.
Tiina Itkonen, California State University - Channel Islands
Bryan Tomlin, California State University - Channel Islands
Tracie Schneider, California State University - Channel Islands
Manuel Correia, California State University - Channel Islands
Karmyn Luong, California State University - Channel Islands
Taylor Grindey, California State University Channel Islands
Luis Sanchez, California State University - Channel Islands