Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Our study evaluated the impact of nonnormality, estimation method, and sample size on the fit indices, power, and standard errors of parameter estimates in path model with continuous data. Data were simulated from a five-variable path model with different degrees of skewness and kurtosis. We found that standard error bias was the smallest when all observed variables were normal. For nonnormal data, the robust maximum likelihood (MLR) and maximum likelihood with mean-adjusted (MLM) estimators produced smaller standard error bias. Sample size and data configuration appeared to be significant drivers of the standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) fit indices. Finally, statistical power was higher for configurations with normal or moderately nonnormal data.