Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
From above, politicians engender crisis in their discourses around reading and circulate a connection between literacy and economic security for the purpose of legitimating top-down prescribed reforms. This project draws attention to the reproductive harm of Michigan’s Read by Grade 3 (2016) reading reform reproduces from the ground. The researcher used ethnographic case study model and recruited educators from three categories of schools: rural, urban low- poverty, and urban high-poverty. Using methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, themes were analyzed and compared across sites. Findings indicated inequitable allocation of material resources, and emerging themes included preservation, blame, and powerlessness. In turn, teachers in high-poverty schools adopted an ideology of triage and sustained inequities.