Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Some districts’ curricular disparity occurs by excluding students using a first-generation design that puts students on a track headed to a school with no AP or IB offerings (“no-CP” schools) or on a track that piles-on resources to students headed to the school specializing in college prep (CP). Intra-district resource factors explain many of the racialized patterns endemic to tracked school enrollments. Certain racial groups of students are disadvantaged to opportunities more than their peers. This between-school tracking may be “cropping” some students to these no-CP schools to keep the “cream of the crop” at other schools. The population of White, non-Hispanic students largely explains the impetus of districts to hyper-focus resources in a single high school specializing in CP.