Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study investigated the impact of vicarious learning (learning-by-observing) from a game compared to enactive learning (learning-by-playing) and conventional instruction on college students’ statistics knowledge, self-efficacy, and situational interest. Eighty-seven students learned about distributions by playing a game, watching a mastery model play, or completing a conventional activity. Results showed no differences in knowledge between vicarious and enactive learning. There were no differences across conditions on self-efficacy. Vicarious learning from a game was more effective at promoting triggered situational interest compared to conventional instruction, but not maintained interest compared to enactive learning. This study indicated little support for adopting vicarious learning as an alternative instruction to enactive learning and conventional methods for promoting statistics education.