Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this comparative case study was to understand why some federal higher education bills have been successfully enacted while others, including some with bipartisan support, have not. This study examined six federal higher education bills – including two that would have reauthorized the Higher Education Act (HEA) and four others that sought to amend the HEA – for the purpose of understanding the common characteristics of successfully enacted federal higher education legislation and the common characteristics of unenacted federal higher education legislation. Findings from this study illuminate factors that make the passage of higher education policies more likely and may help forge a pathway toward more effective legislating in the federal higher education policy space.