Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
While it is known that small group work is an effective tool in undergraduate math instruction in terms of student outcomes, the implications for student experiences are less clear. Using ideas from intersectionality theory, role theory, and established work on analysis of group work in math classrooms, this paper explores how students in small groups participated in and discussed math problems. A case study approach that included a group observation and individual interviews generated an example of a discussion where students collaborated with each other well – i.e. were socially productive – but did not arrive at a reasonable mathematical conclusion – i.e. were mathematically unproductive. This has implications for practitioners in considering how they cycle through their classrooms during small group work.