Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
As COVID-19 forced higher education institutions (HEIs) to close campuses, stakeholders nationwide filed lawsuits seeking refunds. The University of California (UC) system, located in a state with affirmative-action controversies and an ethnoracially diverse population, received multiple class action lawsuits. The UC lawsuits present opportunities to examine how discursive practices in legal documents reflect various parties’ interests converging and diverging during large-scale crises. We ask: How do stakeholders and HEIs communicate their interests converging and diverging when HEIs experience a large-scale crisis? We employ critical discourse analysis to examine the data. Preliminary findings suggest stakeholders’ interest in premium on-campus experiences diverged from HEIs interest in curbing COVID-19. The study has implications for research and practice about HEI crisis response.