Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This article theorizes classroom ethnography as a form of racialized surveillance. Focusing on the interaction of “Dominic,” a Black focal student, frame analysis is used to investigate how researcher surveillance becomes relevant and is negotiated. The analysis demonstrates that a surveillance frame was consequential to Dominic’s interaction and that Dominic’s verbal behavior was sensitive to the racialized element of surveillance generally and to anti-blackness specifically. The analysis further shows how Dominic engaged in “dark sousveillance” (Browne, 2015) as a form of ethnographic refusal, and the ensuing discussion considers the ways that ethnographic representation of dark sousveillance and other Black fugitive practices can recursively promote “abolitionist” (Shange, 2019) goals.