Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Introductory physics courses suffer high failure rates yet are slow to adopt innovative teaching strategies. Secondary analysis of Survey of Instructional Practices in Introductory Chemistry, Mathematics, and Physics revealed four latent classes of introductory physics instructors using items measuring workplace socialization. Membership in these four latent classes predicted statistically significant differences in beliefs about instruction and self-reported instructional practices. “Research-intensive” instructors held the most regressive beliefs about student learning and effective instruction while “teaching-intensive” instructors had the most supportive. We interpret these findings using differential organizational socialization and Role Theory. Differentiating professional development for the four latent classes of instructors may better support innovative teaching practice and reduce failure in this STEM gatekeeper course.