Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Recent studies found that reporting subscores in educational testing rarely offers added value for test users (e.g., Haberman et al., 2009; Sinharay, 2010; Sinharay et al., 2007, 2010). Concerns surrounding utility of subscores—namely, that “information obtained from subscores that seems intuitively useful may not contain additional information over and above the total score” (Meijer et al., 2017, p. 2)—apply equally to assessment and evaluation in higher education. One widely adopted survey that uses subscores is the National Survey of Student Engagement, or NSSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ten NSSE subscores (or “engagement indicators”) demonstrated sufficient reliability and distinctness to support validity of interpretation and use at the individual student and aggregate college levels.