Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
By analyzing government and newspaper records, the paper demonstrates that Head Start’s appeal among 1960s policymakers and Black activists alike was to support poor Black parents, not educate their children as is traditionally imagined, though through differing discourses. In particular, Head Start allowed policymakers to provide concessions to Black mothers’ economic aspirations while promoting an ideology that stigmatized Black parents and suppressed the potential for collective organizing between struggling poor and middle-class families. This finding is significant as Head Start’s origins is emblematic of the continued focus on education-based policies to respond to more radical demands for uplift and channel unrest towards individual and cultural reforms, rather than accepting responsibility how un- and under-employment is fundamentally structured by racial capitalism.