Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Type: Paper Session
Evaluations to measure program effectiveness can influence innovative decision-making by not only generating credible evidence, but knowledge brokering for utilization by pertinent stakeholders. Evaluation policies encompass most aspects of evaluation practice and theory, and can aid or constrain the crucial work of federal agencies, foundations and nonprofits. Research-practice partnerships have become increasingly popular for promoting evidence use. These three studies examine how evaluation policies and partnerships can foster use of evidence based polices among various stakeholders in different contexts.
Using Rasch Measurement Theory for Responsive Program Evaluation - Albert Anthony Clairmont, University of California- Santa Barbara; Daniel Katz, University of California - Santa Barbara; Mike Wilton, University of California - Santa Barbara
From Evaluating Programs to System Change: Insights From a Philanthropic Case Study - Emily Gates, Boston College; Francisca Fils-Aime; Jane Erickson; Bobby Milstein
The Role of Context: A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Evaluation Context - Carl Westine, University of North Carolina - Charlotte; Zhi Li, University of North Carolina - Charlotte
Accepting the Responsibility of Program and Policy Improvement: Institutionalizing Evaluation in the U.S. Federal Government - Esther Nolton, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Marvin Powell, George Mason University; Divya Varier, George Mason University; Valerie Jean Caracelli; Rodney K. Hopson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign