Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Sign In
We examined the role of visual representations and knowledge of relational statements on children’s understanding of the structure of compare word problems. Second and third graders (N = 82) were randomly assigned to three representation conditions: (a) abstract pictures; realistic pictures that were (b) relevant, and (c) irrelevant to the story described in the problem. On the Problem Structure Task, children were presented a compare problem containing inconsistent language structures and judged whether a visual representation matched its structure. On the Relational Statement Task, children judged whether two statements describing an additive comparison between two sets were equivalent in meaning. Representation type had no effect on performance, whereas knowledge of relational language accounted for significant variance in children’s problem structure understanding.