Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Sign In
This paper focuses on myths and assumptions that undergird the rhetoric of school choice for traditionally marginalized students, particularly students with disabilities. Pro-choice advocates argue that by providing choice through marketized education, students and families are able to access better educational opportunities to which they otherwise would not have access. This critical ethnographic case study took place over the course of one school year in a small, urban charter school which served students in grades 9–12 in a working-class neighborhood. The author explores three myths: that charter schools provide more choices for historically marginalized students, that these students are empowered through school choice, and that competition in the education marketplace leads to innovation and excellence.