Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Sign In
This paper reports on a study that examined the factor structure of the Assessment for Learning measurement instrument (AfLMi). Data were gathered from 176 middle school mathematics teachers in Ethiopia. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed using the robust mean and variance-adjusted weighted least squares, an estimation method for ordered categorical data, in Mplus 8.6. The original correlated four-factor model was compared to four competing models: one-factor, correlated three-factor, second order, and bifactor. The results showed that the bifactor model outperformed the other models, indicating that the AfLMi predominantly measures one general practice (Assessment for Learning) in the Ethiopian context, with little evidence that the four specific AfL strategies can be used independently as subscales as hypothesized in the original instrument.