Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This paper aims to document high school students’ understandings and judgments of different disciplinary practices, based on quantitative and qualitative analyses of adolescent samples in North America (Canada and the US; N = 88) and South America (Colombia; N = 77). Questionnaires and interviews explored youths’ perspectives on responses to harms between peers at school, including their endorsement of authority involvement, preferred responses to harm, and the reasoning underlying their judgments. Youths generally endorsed teachers’ involvement in helping them navigate peer harm, and their preferred strategies were guided by varied goals and concerns (e.g., victims’ needs, justice, accountability). Intriguing differences emerged across the two samples; implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Holly Recchia, Concordia University - Montreal
Presenting Author
Laura Pareja Conto, Concordia University - Montreal
Non-Presenting Author
Angelica Restrepo
Non-Presenting Author
Gabriel M Velez, Marquette University
Non-Presenting Author
Cecilia Wainryb
Non-Presenting Author
Ana M. Velasquez, Universidad de los Andes
Non-Presenting Author