Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
The purpose of the study was to investigate a) whether the effects of hand tracing and whole-body tracing reported in the literature could be extended to adults, and b) the relative superiority of whole-body tracing over hand tracing on learning outcomes, cognitive load, and intrinsic motivation. A total of 78 college students were randomly assigned to three conditions: body tracing (n = 25), hand tracing (n = 25), and no tracing (n = 28). The results revealed beneficial effects of body tracing on germane load, extraneous load, interest, and self-monitoring, some of which were dependent upon learners’ perceived difficulty and invested effort. These findings were discussed within the framework of cognitive load theory and embodied cognition theory.