Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Geometry has been traditionally taught in the U.S. so that students can use their intuition, prepare for the workforce, reason like mathematicians, or learn to do proofs. The study investigates teachers’ perspectives about using problems situated in visual arts contexts to fulfill those justifications. In three focus groups, nine geometry teachers discussed sample lessons. The research questions are: How do geometry teachers’ arguments relate to the four justifications? How do adaptations to the lessons align with the justifications? Using the Toulmin model for arguments, we found 75 arguments. Most of the arguments supported discovery-learning, appreciation for real-world objects, and connections with students’ backgrounds. The teachers valued problems for developing mathematical reasoning but worried about the explicitness of the math content.