Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This study investigated the relationship between paternalistic leadership and intra-team conflict and the moderation effect of moral leadership within a University Crisis Management Team (CMT). Examining 312 pairs of leaders and their subordinates from the CMT in a public university in China, our findings indicated that the CMT members showed a lower level of authoritarian leadership but a higher level of benevolent leadership and moral leadership during COVID19. Benevolent and moral leadership were positively associated with cognitive conflict (β1=0.371,p<0.01; β2=0.149,p<0.05); meanwhile, authoritarian leadership was positively related to affective conflict (β=0.171,p<0.01). In addition, moral leadership significantly moderated the relationship between authoritarian leadership and affective conflict. Specifically, higher levels of moral leadership mitigated the positive relationship between authoritarian leadership and affective conflict.