Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This paper analyzes the new math curriculum of British Columbia (BC), Canada, to discuss the representations of truth, knowledge, and teachers' roles. It aims to understand how curriculum policies construct meanings throughout explicit written goals and implicit discourses. It analyzes all curricular documents from the new and old BC math curriculum using Bacchi & Goodwin's (2016) methodology “What is the problem represented to be?”. It finds contradictions between the old and new curriculum representations of knowledge and teachers’ roles, concluding that BC policies should i) establish a clear meaning to assessment and pedagogy and ii) give autonomy to teachers implementing the curriculum. These are essential actions to amplify the representations of truth and knowledge in the new BC math curriculum.