Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Sixty-three participants from two age groups (7-8, 15-16) were interviewed about hypothetical situations where the student shared lunch with another student, or did so towards white but not black students. Next, a teacher commanded that the student stop sharing, after which the student deceptively resumed their behavior. Participants evaluated and reasoned about each action described. Responses varied by equality condition, act type, domain of intention, and by age. Age based differences suggest participants differentially engaged in multifaceted reasoning about social situations when judgments were in opposition, and that reasoning about dictates and deception are not universal in either group, but used to promote equality consistent with their moral judgments, and increasingly with age, to maintain a sense of autonomy.