Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
In the last year, state legislatures across the United States have introduced a rash of bills designed to control how K–12 teachers discuss ‘divisive issues.’ This legislation has prompted an outpouring of news coverage on the impact of these laws, but sidelined in this discourse are the perspectives of teachers. This mixed methods study seeks to understand these restrictions on teaching ‘divisive issues’ with specific attention to the perceived impact they have on teachers. We identified three themes salient to how teachers as ‘gatekeepers’ (Thornton, 1991) anticipate these legislative efforts influencing their practice: curricular autonomy, context, and institutional guidance. The paper concludes with the significance of these findings, including potential policy implications at the national, state, and local levels.