Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
The current study evaluated the performances of traditional methods and an alternative method “Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA)” to determine the optimal number of factors to retain using Monte Carlo simulation. Sample sizes, number of factors, number of variables per factor, factor loadings, and factor correlations were manipulated, resulting in 72 conditions in total. The accuracy of all methods tends to be negatively affected as the factor correlations increase. With large factor correlations, parallel analysis (PA) with principal axis factoring performs the best, followed by EGA; while with smaller factor correlations, EGA performs as well as PA with principal component analysis. Minimum average partial and its variant have lower accuracy than other methods.