Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Education policy has long been plagued by a knowledge-to-action gap. Researchers have minimized this gap by engaging individuals who are directly affected by policy, like youth, in primary research studies using participatory research methods (PRM). PRM emphasize academic researchers ceding space in the construction of research and knowledge, allowing for individuals with relevant lived experience to co-shape the research. PRM results in a more authentic understanding of education policy and opens paths to effect change through community-driven implementation. Using PRM to support evidence syntheses seems wise, given that syntheses are also tools for bridging the knowledge-to-action gap. In this paper, the authors examine the methodological challenges and opportunities of conducting a participatory evidence synthesis with high-school students and college freshmen.
Sarah Peko-Spicer, American Institutes for Research
Presenting Author
Joshua R. Polanin, American Institutes for Research
Non-Presenting Author
Dorothy L. Espelage, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Non-Presenting Author
Luz Robinson, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Non-Presenting Author