Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Abstract
We conducted a large-scale simulation to evaluate several criteria (i.e., Kaiser’s criterion, empirical Kaiser’s criterion, parallel analysis, and profile likelihood) for determining the dimensionality of binary variables given combinations of correlation matrices (Pearson r or tetrachoric ρ) and analysis methods (principal component analysis or exploratory factor analysis); and combinations of study characteristics—sample sizes (100, 250, 1000), variable splits (10%/90%, 25%/75%, 50%/50%), underlying dimensions (1, 3, 5, 10), and items per dimension (3, 5, 10) with 1000 replications per condition. Parallel analysis outperformed the other criteria (recovering dimensionality in 87.9% of replications) when using PCA with Pearson correlations—the most effective matrix-analysis combination. Guidance for selecting criteria were provided.