Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
One point of contention in the refutation text literature is whether testing is a cognitively neutral task. Theoretically, pre-testing could influence learning and metacognitive judgments, but this has not been investigated empirically. In this study, we adopt a Solomon Four-Group Design to investigate the influence of pre-testing when learning from refutational text. We present two concerning findings. First, participants’ metacognitive judgments in the pre-testing groups were significantly higher than their post-only counterparts. Second, a marked advantage for the refutation text group that also received the pre-test. Together, these results indicate that traditional pre-test/post-test experimental designs using refutational texts might be problematic. Scholarly and practical significance was discussed in this paper.