Quantitative Education Researchers' Conceptualization of Validity in Research Design and Perceptions of Their Work

• In Event: Marriott Roundtable Session Five
  In Roundtable Session: Educational Research Methodology (Table 3)

Abstract

The question of what constitutes good evidence for a claim has become increasingly important in what many have dubbed the post-truth era. Researchers must model how to acquire and disseminate quality information.
Despite the perception that quantitative researchers are more consistent in their practices than qualitative researchers, disagreements abound in the use of the terminology associated with quantitative methodology. This study explores, through detailed interviews, nine quantitative researchers’ conceptualization of validity, as well as their research practices, their research aims, and their decision-making processes while conducting a study. This paper answers Shadish’s (2011) call for empirical evidence rather than theoretical debates when it comes to discussions about what constitutes good evidence.

Author

• Flanny C Alamparambil, University of Toronto
  Presenting Author