Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Compared to a large body of literature that corroborates the positive effects of self-efficacy on desired educational outcomes, relatively less attention has been paid to how the function of self-efficacy differs by its accuracy or bias. Using the 2015 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) dataset of Korea and the US, we examined the moderating role of calibration (accuracy, bias) in the relationships of self-efficacy with motivation (interest, utility value) and achievement. The results from the two countries consistently demonstrated the effects of self-efficacy were significantly moderated by its accuracy and bias. The positive relationships of self-efficacy with interest and achievement were stronger for students with accurate than inaccurate self-efficacy and also for overconfident than underconfident students in both countries.
Sungwha Kim, Korea University - Brain and Motivation Research Institute
Presenting Author
Eunjung Myoung, Korea University
Non-Presenting Author
Ju Ae Kim, Korea University - Brain and Motivation Research Institute
Non-Presenting Author
Suyeon Gena Kim, bMRI/Korea University
Non-Presenting Author
Seung Hyun Lee, Brain and Motivation Research Institute
Non-Presenting Author
Pey-Yan Liou, Korea University
Non-Presenting Author
Mimi Bong, Korea University
Non-Presenting Author