Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This exploratory study investigated how coping strategies impact emotions and well-being among post-secondary faculty in the context of academic setbacks. Findings from 733 participants (35 countries) showed faculty to exhibit four distinct patterns of emotion regulation: engaged and comprehensive coping profiles were adaptive in corresponding to positive emotions, lower burnout, and higher job satisfaction. In contrast, problem-avoidant and disengaged coping profiles were maladaptive and related to more negative emotions, with disengaged copers reporting the greatest burnout and lowest job satisfaction levels. Findings are discussed in terms of the motivational and behavioral correlates of the emotion regulation in faculty, as well as informing institutional efforts to support faculty well-being.