Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
We draw on Hamilton and Armstrong’s (2021) concept of “class projects” to understand how class and gender together inform how low-SES students at an elite college navigate major selection. We contend that low-SES students choose majors in light of desired “mobility projects.” Further, the pursuit of mobility projects is also gendered: Women experience dual and sometimes dueling obligations to pursue disciplines with high earnings potential – fields not traditionally welcoming to women – and to pursue careers for the social good. In sum, the pursuit of social mobility in college is fraught with demands for low-SES students, as they simultaneously manage academic interests, future financial stability, and the social expectations of their more privileged peers, a burden low-SES women especially carry.