Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
In the last few decades, the word ‘safety’ has become increasingly pervasive in educational policies and debates worldwide, raising little opposition. Some educational scholars, however, have recently begun to question the dangerous effects of this seemingly benevolent idea (e.g., Warrington & Larkins, 2019). In this study, I problematize ‘safety’ by analyzing the assumptions that underlie the discourses produced by UNESCO and New Zealand’s recent educational policies. Using Foucauldian lens, three main assumptions were identified: a) safety issues can be solved through behavioral-attitudinal change, b) the responsibility of safety relies on individuals, and c) children are victims that need adult protection. These ‘truths’ not only justify protectionist regulations and disciplinary practices, but also operate as a neoliberal mechanism to depoliticize education.