Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Despite the significance of factor scores in assessment practice, its estimation is often ambiguous, facing even more challenges when model misspecifications exist. This study adopted hybrid centrality within a network analysis framework to estimate factor scores. A simulation study comparing the CFA scores (regression or Bartlett scoring method) with the network scores was conducted under both proper specification and misspecification conditions. For a correctly specified model, the network scores performed similarly to CFA scores in terms of RMSE and correlation of true scores and latent scores. Significantly, the network scores showed substantial robustness under misspecification conditions with cross-loadings compared to CFA using regression or Bartlett scoring. When model misspecifications are possible, the network approach is preferred over traditional estimates.