Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This study examines the effects of computer-based scaffoldings on students’ metacognitive monitoring and problem-solving efficiency. Seventy-two medical students completed two diagnostic tasks in an intelligent tutoring system (ITS), BioWorld. After problem-solving, students reported their confidence judgments about the proposed diagnosis. We also extracted students’ use of three scaffolding types (i.e., conceptual, strategic, and metacognitive), diagnostic performance, and completion time from BioWorld log files. Students’ monitoring judgment accuracy was then computed along with problem-solving efficiency. Linear mixed-effects models indicated that the intensive use of metacognitive scaffoldings positively predicted students’ monitoring accuracy. Moreover, strategic scaffoldings negatively related to problem-solving efficiency, whereas metacognitive scaffoldings positively influenced problem-solving efficiency. Findings from this study guide ITS developers to optimize the design of computer-based scaffoldings.
Tingting Wang, McGill University
Presenting Author
Juan Zheng, Lehigh University
Non-Presenting Author
Chengyi Tan, McGill University
Non-Presenting Author
Alejandra Ruiz-Segura, McGill University
Non-Presenting Author
Xiaoshan Huang, McGill University
Non-Presenting Author
Susanne P. Lajoie, McGill University
Non-Presenting Author