Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework has become the most-cited framework for online learning. Although it was created as a generic framework, as more courses are offered in an online format, understanding how instructors intentionally or unintentionally make design decisions related to the CoI across disciplines is worthwhile. Using a multiple-case study design, we observed archived courses across four discipline classifications (pure-hard, pure-soft, applied-hard, and applied-soft) for CoI indicators and then conducted semi-structured interviews to determine participants’ rationale and intentionality for using or not using the CoI indicators observed in their online courses. While results suggest varying degrees of application of CoI indicators across disciplines, this study offers insight into how and why communities of inquiry are created across disciplines.
Jennifer C. Richardson, Purdue University
Presenting Author
Adrie A. Koehler, Purdue University
Presenting Author
Deepti Tagare, Purdue University
Presenting Author
Lucia Urena-Rodriguez, Purdue University
Presenting Author
Qian Xu, Purdue University
Presenting Author
Zhuo Zhang, Purdue University
Presenting Author
Holly Fiock, Purdue University
Presenting Author
Yishi Long, Purdue University
Presenting Author
Mohammad Shams Duha, Purdue University
Presenting Author