Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Despite the affordances of social media for encouraging learning as a collective negotiation of claims around complex real-world social issues, existing learning sciences research has primarily leveraged such platforms for the replication of existing pedagogical practices. Given the importance of argumentation as literacy practice in STEM education, we examine how users leverage Twitter to engage in argumentation with socioscientific issues related to COVID-19. Findings suggests that traditional conceptualizations of argumentation may not capture discourse practices where platform-specific features may play a more prominent role in the negotiation and advancement of claims. Implications for learning science design and research that emphasizes context, practice and scale of social media use in education are discussed.
Justice Toshiba Walker, University of Texas - El Paso
Presenting Author
Amanda Barany, University of Pennsylvania
Presenting Author
Alan Barrera, University of Texas - El Paso
Non-Presenting Author
Stefan Slater, University of Wisconsin - Madison
Non-Presenting Author
Omar Badreddin, The University of Texas - El Paso
Non-Presenting Author
Sayed Mohsin Reza, Pennsylvania State University - Harrisburg
Non-Presenting Author
Michael A. Johnson, University of North Texas
Non-Presenting Author