Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
As multi-unidimensional tests are becoming increasingly popular in educational and psychological fields, it is important to gain content and construct validity evidence efficiently to develop high-quality multi-unidimensional instruments. However, traditional methods were challenged by small sample sizes. Analyzing response data without considering the ordinal nature is another challenge. To overcome these two challenges, we proposed a Bayesian method to integrate experts’ ratings and participants’ data to establish a unified model for validity evidence. Simulation studies were done to compare the performance of the Bayesian method to the traditional CFA under multiple situations. The results show that the Bayesian method outperforms the traditional CFA the most when the sample sizes of participants are small and the instruments are dichotomously scored.