Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This study examines the roles of individual differences in vocabulary, knowledge, beliefs, and reading engagement in constructing more complete, coherent understandings about a controversial topic: Should children receive vaccinations against common diseases? College undergraduates (n=119) completed assessments of vocabulary knowledge, and specific topic knowledge and beliefs. Students read two texts that conveyed accurate information that vaccines are helpful, and two that conveyed inaccurate information that vaccines are unnecessary in modern times, and then wrote an essay from memory. Beyond pre-reading individual differences, depth of reading engagement with accurate information predicted understanding that there are conflicting viewpoints, and tagging of the different ideas to their respective sources.
Catherine McGrath, Georgia State University
Presenting Author
Jason Braasch, Georgia State University
Non-Presenting Author
Xinle Hong, Georgia State University
Non-Presenting Author
Erica Kessler, University of Memphis
Non-Presenting Author
Laura K. Allen, University of Minnesota
Non-Presenting Author
Danielle S. McNamara, Arizona State University
Non-Presenting Author