Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Employment projections emphasize the need to confer more STEM degrees, but current research has not examined how the composition of students’ social networks may affect their likelihood of persisting in a STEM major. The purpose of this study is to test the relationship between homophily of STEM-majoring peers in STEM students’ social networks and those students’ commitment to their major, as well as how this relationship differs between LGBTQ STEM students and their heterosexual, cisgender peers. Through egocentric social network analysis, we found STEM homophily may promote greater commitment to STEM for heterosexual students, as well as for cisgender women. Network homophily reproduces the advantages of those with privilege; diverse networks could distribute opportunities more equitably.