Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Algorithms may be better at prediction than humans in a variety of contexts, however, they are not perfect. An understanding of the ways educators use algorithmic advice is needed to ensure that accurate algorithmic insights are being utilized, make certain that educators have the knowledge and skills needed to identify poorly constructed or purposely biased algorithms, and attempt to avoid unintended consequences. This quantitative study uses a 2x2 pretest-posttest experimental design in a virtual environment to investigate how educators use and trust algorithmic advice, including the way contextual framing (i.e., algorithm purpose and educational information) and individual-level differences (i.e., teaching experience) impact these relationships. Group comparison and multiple regression techniques will be utilized to test hypotheses.