Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Epistemological marking, that comprises evidentials and modality marking, is the focus of the comparative mixed-methods analysis of graduate students’ (86) academic discourses and texts, in the educational psychology disciplinary-context. Cross-corpora analyses revealed, among other findings, that epistemology marking in speaking centered around personal/sensory access to epistemic basis for referential material, while frequent deductive/hypothetical stories might be used in lieu of hearsay-evidentials (written ‘specialty’). Cross-gender comparisons reveal male stronger modality in both speaking and writing, and epistemic marking in the spoken corpus. Cross-ethnic findings unraveled Caucasian and Other-ethnicity evidential uses in writing and Hispanic edge in inferencing-structures. Hispanics and African-American’s spoken discourse was most hedged (face-saving) though. The study calls for educational supports for traditionally minoritized-groups and their epistemological/communicative competences.